What is the result of the defense attorney's argument regarding the search of the boy's bedroom?

The argument surrounding the search of the boy's bedroom hinges on the authority of the mother to grant permission for the search. In legal situations, the concept of authority is critical, particularly when it comes to consent searches.

The first choice highlights a key legal principle: while the mother could consent to the search of the open areas of the bedroom, her authority does not automatically extend to searching enclosed containers within that space without additional context. For instance, if the containers are locked or specifically belonging to the boy, the argument goes that the mother lacks the authority to permit a search of those items, thereby making the search potentially unconstitutional.

This understanding of authority is essential in determining the admissibility of any evidence obtained during such a search. If the court finds that the defense attorney's objection is valid, it reinforces the need for clear delineation of consent in searches, especially involving minors, who may have a reasonable expectation of privacy within their personal spaces. The focus is thus on the nuances of authority and constitutional rights in the context of searches, making the first option the most logically sound outcome of the defense attorney's argument.