What is the outcome of the case regarding the discovery of files if the original search was illegal?

In cases where the original search is deemed illegal, the general outcome is that the evidence obtained during that search cannot be used in court. This adheres to the principle of the exclusionary rule, which is designed to deter law enforcement from conducting unlawful searches and seizures. If evidence is gathered through an illegal search, it undermines the integrity of the judicial process and the defendant's rights, compelling the court to reject the use of that evidence.

As a result, the case would not be able to stand in court effectively since it relies on tainted evidence that cannot be presented. While there could be situations where a case may proceed with some evidence excluded or a new search warrant may be acquired for future investigations, the core principle of an illegal search leading to a case that does not hold up is firmly established. Such rulings aim to ensure that all evidence presented in a court of law is obtained legitimately, thereby upholding constitutional protections against unreasonable searches.