What could potentially lead to a loss in a legal case involving monitoring employee computers?

The correct choice highlights an important aspect of drafting policies regarding computer monitoring in the workplace. When a policy does not specifically mention keyloggers, it may lead to misunderstandings about the extent of the monitoring performed on employee computers. Keylogging, which involves recording keystrokes, may be viewed as a more invasive form of monitoring compared to general computer monitoring activities.

If employees are not informed that keyloggers will be used, they might argue that their privacy was violated or that they were not adequately notified about the extent of the monitoring being conducted. This lack of transparency could undermine the enforceability of the monitoring policy and potentially lead to legal challenges, particularly if employees claim they were unaware that their keystrokes were being tracked.

A well-drafted policy should clearly outline the types of monitoring that are taking place, including the use of keyloggers if applicable, to protect the employer from claims of unlawful monitoring practices. Inadequate policy language can erode trust and create legal vulnerabilities.

In contrast, while other options touch on valid concerns, they may not as directly contribute to the risk of loss in a legal case related to monitoring practices. For instance, a signed policy is important, as is ensuring adequate evidence of wrongdoing; however,