Evidence collected with no expectation of privacy is considered admissible. Is this statement true or false?

The statement is true because evidence collected without an expectation of privacy is generally considered admissible in court. This principle stems from the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. When individuals are in public spaces or areas where they have no reasonable expectation of privacy—for instance, in a public park or on the sidewalk—law enforcement can observe and collect evidence without needing a warrant or probable cause.

This admissibility underscores the legal notion that if someone does not expect their actions or communications to remain private, then they cannot claim a violation of privacy rights in relation to the evidence collected. As a result, such evidence can typically be presented in court, making it a crucial aspect of investigations. The other choices introduce nuances that aren't necessary here, as the broad legal consensus supports the admissibility of evidence obtained without a privacy expectation in most situations.